Defending Against Financial Fraud Charges in California

Financial fraud is a serious allegation that can have severe consequences, including significant fines, imprisonment, and a tarnished reputation. At The Law Offices of Stanley L. Friedman, we specialize in defending clients charged with financial fraud and other complex white-collar crimes. Below we discuss some of the common defenses typically available in financial fraud cases and how our law firm can help. If you are under investigation for financial crimes or if you have been formally charged with financial fraud, contact The Law Offices of Stanley L. Friedman in Los Angeles to speak with a skilled and experienced California white-collar criminal defense attorney.

Understanding Financial Fraud

Financial fraud encompasses a wide range of illegal activities, including embezzlement, insider trading, mortgage fraud, and securities fraud. While one offense may be very different from another, all of these crimes typically involve deceit or dishonesty for financial gain. Defending against financial fraud requires a nuanced approach, as these cases often involve intricate financial transactions and voluminous documentation.

Common defenses in financial fraud cases include all of the following, among others:

1. Lack of Intent

One of the most effective defenses in financial fraud cases is demonstrating a lack of intent. For a fraud charge to hold, the prosecution must prove that the defendant knowingly engaged in deceitful practices. If the defense can show that the actions were a result of negligence or a genuine mistake rather than intentional fraud, the charges may be reduced or dismissed.

2. Insufficient Evidence

Another critical defense strategy is challenging the sufficiency of the evidence. Financial fraud cases often hinge on complex financial records and transactions. By scrutinizing the evidence, the defense can identify gaps, inconsistencies, or errors that cast doubt on the prosecution’s case. If the evidence is deemed insufficient to support the charges, the case may not proceed to trial, or if it does, the evidence might not be sufficient to support a conviction (guilt beyond a reasonable doubt).

3. Entrapment

Entrapment occurs when law enforcement induces a person to commit a crime they would not have otherwise committed. In financial fraud cases, this could involve undercover agents or informants pressuring the defendant into illegal activities. Proving entrapment requires demonstrating that the defendant was not predisposed to commit the crime and that they were coerced or lured into it by authorities.

4. Good Faith

The good faith defense argues that the defendant believed their actions were legal and had no intent to defraud. This defense can be particularly effective in cases where the defendant relied on professional advice or genuinely believed their conduct complied with the law. Demonstrating good faith can negate the element of intent required for a fraud conviction.

5. Duress

In some cases, defendants may argue that they committed the alleged fraudulent activities under duress. This means they were forced to act due to threats or coercion from another party, such as an employer. For the duress defense to be successful, the defendant must show that they had a reasonable fear of imminent harm and that the threat was inescapable.

6. Statute of Limitations

The statute of limitations sets a time limit within which charges must be filed. In California, the statute of limitations for financial fraud varies depending on the specific offense but generally ranges from three to six years. If the charges are filed after the statute of limitations has expired, the defense can move to dismiss the case.

7. Lack of Knowledge

Financial fraud cases often involve complex financial instruments and transactions. The defense can argue that the defendant lacked the specialized knowledge necessary to understand the fraudulent nature of their actions. This can be particularly relevant in cases involving lower-level employees or individuals without a financial background.

The Role of a Skilled Defense Attorney

Defending against financial fraud charges requires a thorough understanding of both criminal law and complex financial matters. At The Law Offices of Stanley L. Friedman, we leverage our extensive experience in white-collar criminal defense to develop tailored strategies for each case. Our approach includes:

• Detailed Investigation: We conduct comprehensive investigations to uncover exculpatory evidence and identify weaknesses in the prosecution’s case.

• Expert Witnesses: We collaborate with financial experts, forensic accountants, and other specialists to challenge the prosecution’s evidence and provide alternative explanations for the alleged conduct.

• Negotiation: We engage in proactive negotiations with prosecutors to seek favorable plea agreements or the dismissal of charges when appropriate.

• Trial Advocacy: When necessary, we are prepared to aggressively defend our clients in court, presenting a compelling case to the jury and challenging the prosecution at every turn.

Contact The Law Offices of Stanley L. Friedman for Financial Fraud Defense in Los Angeles and California

Facing financial fraud charges can be scary and intimidating, but with the right legal strategy, it is possible to mount a robust defense. At The Law Offices of Stanley L. Friedman, we are dedicated to protecting our clients’ rights and achieving the best possible outcomes. If you are facing financial fraud charges, call us today at 310-598-2000 to schedule a consultation and learn how we can help defend your future.

Share This Page: